AI Isn’t Delivering Marketing Efficiency, It’s Repeating Programmatic’s Broken Promise via @sejournal, @gregjarboe
All Paid Media PPC News Social MediaAdvertising Video Advertising Columns Ask A PPC ExpertNEW PPC Pulse Webinar A New Place To Look: Where Your Next AI Citations & Clicks Come From Learn how to turn real customer language into AEO insights, FAQ content, and measurable AI citations and clicks with CallTrackingMetrics. Digital Marketing All Digital Marketing Analytics & Data Ecommerce Lead Generation Content Marketing Social Platforms Google YouTube Reddit LinkedIn TikTokNEW WordPress Other CMS Platforms Webinar A New Place To Look: Where Your Next AI Citations & Clicks Come From Learn how to turn real customer language into AEO insights, FAQ content, and measurable AI citations and clicks with CallTrackingMetrics. SEJ Live Webinars Rundowns PodcastNEW Ebooks All Resources Webinar A New Place To Look: Where Your Next AI Citations & Clicks Come From Learn how to turn real customer language into AEO insights, FAQ content, and measurable AI citations and clicks with CallTrackingMetrics. Avoid programmatic's accounting mistake by tracking AI marketing's hidden rework and maintenance hours before automation crowds out long-term strategy. VIP CONTRIBUTOR Greg Jarboe 1 minute ago ⋅ 6 min read VIP CONTRIBUTOR Greg Jarboe President and co-founder at SEO-PR Bio Follow Eight years ago, I taught a course called Programmatic Buying Foundations. The pitch, right there in the course title, was that data and technology could deliver highly relevant, effective, and measurable ads at scale. Read Kevin Indig’s new Growth Memo column on the hidden hours buried inside AI marketing workflows, and you’ll recognize the dark side of my old pitch. The promise of efficiency was broken then, and broken now, too. That recognition isn’t a claim that “I’ve seen this movie before.” It’s a warning about where the efficiency argument for AI marketing tools is likely to crack, because it already cracked once, in a discipline I taught for years. Programmatic Buying Foundations walked marketers through a five-step workflow: Each step came wrapped in case studies from brands like Mondelez, Campbell’s, and Ford India showing the workflow paying off. The framing was always efficiency first, with the assumption that automating the buying would drag effectiveness and measurability along as a byproduct. Here’s the part that gets left out when people wax nostalgic about programmatic’s golden era. The same course had a full section on ad fraud and brand safety, and another on GDPR, because both had become live problems for the exact audiences the efficiency pitch was made to. Advertisers were told automation would make their targeting sharper. They also had to learn, in the same curriculum, how to spot fraudulent inventory, how “lack of transparency” ranked as one of the field’s top concerns, and how new privacy rules made view-through and cross-device conversions harder to trust than the dashboards implied. The tool that was supposed to make measurement more reliable came with an entire unit on why measurement was getting less reliable. Indig’s argument is that AI hasn’t removed marketing work. It moved it. His numbers back that up with more precision than programmatic ever got. METR put 16 experienced developers to work on 246 real-world tasks, a portion with AI assistance and a portion without. The developers expected AI would speed them up by roughly a quarter. Instead, they finished about a fifth slower, and they still believed afterward that it had sped them up. Marketing has its own version of that gap. A BetterUp Labs and Stanford survey of over a thousand workers found that AI-generated “workslop,” content that looks finished but isn’t, took an average of nearly 2 hours to fix each time someone received it, a cost that scales past $9 million a year at a large company. Workday’s research quantifies the give-back too, since for every 10 hours AI saves, roughly four end up spent redoing weak output. Upwork, which polled 2,500 leaders and workers, breaks that reclaimed time down further, with much of it going to checking and fixing the AI output, learning the tools themselves, or simply taking on more work than before. HubSpot’s data shows why this matters at scale. The vast majority of marketing leaders report that their teams already use AI, and a solid majority say their company is building internal AI tools rather than buying them. Indig’s point is that this in-house building doesn’t disappear when the tool ships. It becomes a permanent, mostly invisible maintenance job, and somebody has to own it. When that owner takes a vacation, the workflow reverts to manual until they’re back. I should have spotted this a decade ago. Programmatic promised that automation would replace manual media buying labor. What it actually did was convert manual buying labor into fraud monitoring labor, brand safety labor, and compliance labor, none of which showed up in the original pitch deck. AI marketing tools are giving the identical spiel. The labor of prompting, building, and maintaining doesn’t vanish. It gets reclassified as something that doesn’t look like “real work” on a project plan, right up until a stakeholder asks why scaled content production hasn’t paid off yet. My unvarnished take is that this isn’t a story about AI being oversold, exactly. It’s a story about efficiency claims in marketing technology consistently getting measured on the wrong side of the ledger, the hours saved on the visible task, never the hours spent setting up, and babysitting the system that saves them. That was true of programmatic in 2018. It’s true of homebrew AI workflows in 2026. The technology changed. The accounting error didn’t. See also: Why Digital PR Fundamentals Beat AI Tactics: What Marketing Leaders Should Focus On If you manage or work inside a marketing team building its own AI tools, three moves come directly out of both the programmatic playbook and Indig’s data. 1. Put a name and a shutdown date on every internal AI tool. Programmatic’s ad fraud problem got solved partly through ads.txt, an industry standard that made accountability structural rather than optional. Your homebrew AI workflows need the same discipline. Every tool gets an owner and a review date, or it becomes permanent invisible headcount. 2. Track the hours nobody’s counting, not just the hours saved. Ask your team not “did this AI workflow save you time” but “how many hours this month went to building, fixing, or maintaining an AI tool instead of doing the work it was meant to speed up.” The METR study shows people will answer the first question wrong even when they’re being honest. 3. Protect the slow return on investment work on purpose. Content depth, digital PR, and the mentions that actually get cited in AI answers are exactly the work programmatic-era marketers under similar time pressure let slip first, because it doesn’t show results for months. Ring-fence a fixed share of your team’s time for it before AI tooling gets to claim the rest by default. I taught the efficiency pitch once. I also taught, in the same course, a whole unit on why it didn’t hold up on its own. If your marketing team is chasing AI efficiency without asking where the hours it isn’t counting went, then you’re not looking at a new problem. You’re looking at my old syllabus with a new cover. Add SEJ as a preferred source on Google Read Full Bio VIP CONTRIBUTOR Greg Jarboe President and co-founder at SEO-PR Before Greg Jarboe retired, he was the president of SEO-PR, which he co-founded with Jamie O’Donnell, from 2003 to 2025. ... Learn how to connect search, AI, and PPC into one unstoppable strategy. Google Lost Its Scraping Case – Now You Have To Pick A Side On The Open Web AI Changed My Work. And Yours, Too Enterprise SEO Operating Models That Scale In 2026 And Beyond Join 75,000+ Digital Leaders. Learn how to connect search, AI, and PPC into one unstoppable strategy. Learn how to connect search, AI, and PPC into one unstoppable strategy. In a world ruled by algorithms, SEJ brings timely, relevant information for SEOs, marketers, and entrepreneurs to optimize and grow their businesses -- and careers.
Source: Search Engine Journal
This article has been carefully curated and reformatted for educational and informational purposes. Full credit goes to the original publisher.
📚 Visit more helpful articles on Joab Peters Blog
No comments