The psychology behind why AI shows it's working
Resources and ideas to put modern marketers ahead of the curve Insights and strategies for managing contacts, pipelines, and customer relationships at scale Guidance on automations that personalize campaigns, nurture leads, and drive growth Tactics to align marketing and sales, close deals faster, and support modern selling teams Ideas and best practices for delivering seamless support and memorable customer experiences Tips for building high-performing websites and content that attract, convert, and educate Resources for measuring performance, reporting results, and turning data into action Practical perspectives on using AI to streamline work and scale smarter marketing efforts Strategies for selling online, managing payments, and optimizing the digital buying experience Original research, data-backed insights and industry analyses All of HubSpot's marketing, sales, and customer service software on one agentic platform. Free HubSpot CRM Overview of all products"> Overview of all products Marketing Hub"> Marketing Hub Marketing automation software. Free and premium plans Service Hub Customer service software. Free and premium plans Content Hub Content marketing software. Free and premium plans Revenue Hub CPQ, billing, and payments software. Free and premium plans Agent Hub Your central home for building and managing AI agents across the platform Learn more Small Business Bundle The Starter edition of each product, built for startups and small businesses Learn more AEO (Beta) Answer engine optimization tools that track and improve your brand's visibility in AI results Learn more HubSpot Marketplace Connect your favorite apps to HubSpot See all integrations Home Marketing The psychology behind why AI shows it's working The psychology behind why AI shows it's working Written by: Phill Agnew AN INTRODUCTION TO MARKETING PSYCHOLOGY This guide will help you make more informed decisions in marketing. In 2025, most of the major answer engines made an almost identical update. Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and many others started to show what they were thinking. Answer engines would tell the user which websites it was searching, which documents it had opened, and which assumptions it was second-guessing. According to Anthropic, the company that owns Claude, the answer engine does this for three reasons. But I think there’s a fourth reason that AI providers have purposefully hidden from us. In 2011, two Harvard professors published a study in Management Science that sought to understand and challenge the idea that faster means better in a customer service context. They asked 266 participants to use a travel search site. Similar to Skyscanner or Kayak, the user could enter a destination, and the site would pull back several flights to potentially book. However, there was a twist. One group saw just a plain loading wheel on a white background as the search engine filtered through results. The second saw the plain loading wheel, plus a live scrolling list of which airlines were being searched, with fares visibly stacking up as they were found. Interestingly, the wait was randomly set to 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 or 60 seconds. Once participants had seen the results, they were asked to rate the website out of seven. Turns out, the results from the loading wheel that show it’s working were perceived as 8.1% higher value than the same results from a blank loading wheel. Incredibly, people rated the results higher even if the transparent loading wheel took longer. When the search engine showed it was working, people preferred it — even if it took 50 seconds longer to gather the same results. Later, a new group of 118 participants was asked to pick between using a faster site with no transparent loading screen and a slower site with the transparent loading screen. The results that both sites generated were the same. Participants were more likely to pick the slower site with the transparent search over the faster site with the blank search. As with all good science, one paper from 2011 isn’t enough to draw lofty conclusions. Fortunately, in 2022, Dimitrios Tsekouras, Ting Li, and Izak Benbasat published research in Information and Management to explore how signalling effort — even through something as simple as a spinning loader — changes how users evaluate a recommendation system. For the first study, 306 participants were shown a search engine for cars. In a second study, 294 participants were shown an online dating app that used a loading wheel to match potential couples. Participants were split into four groups across two variables: how much effort they had to put in upfront, and whether the system showed effort back. In the high effort conditions, participants saw a rotating loader with the words “calculating results” for seven seconds. In the low effort conditions, results appeared immediately. The recommendations themselves were the same. The only difference was seven seconds of a spinner.
Source: HubSpot
This article has been carefully curated and reformatted for educational and informational purposes. Full credit goes to the original publisher.
📚 Visit more helpful articles on Joab Peters Blog
No comments